🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of votes that came in later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible in which election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously went for Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. So there was some opposition. However overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.